Should Nation-States Retaliate Against Cyber Intelligence Operations?
A legal and strategic analysis using Operation Aurora and Stuxnet as case studies
Examines when a state may lawfully respond to a cyber intelligence operation under the Tallinn Manual 2.0, working through sovereignty, attribution, and the line between retorsions and countermeasures. Uses Aurora and Stuxnet as contrasting case studies to argue that retaliation should stay non-forcible even when a cyber operation crosses into use of force.
“Nation states not only should retaliate against CYBINT operations, but they must. Failing to respond to repeated cyber intrusions signals weakness.”